When misinterpretation leads to sexism: perspectives on gender disparity in Brazilian Herpetology
Abstract
In a recent article published in Nature Communications, AlShebli et al. (2020) analyzed the mentor-protégé relationship in scientific collaborations. Specifically, they examined the impact of gender on scientific careers and concluded that women scientists should rely on male guidance for a successful career and higher publication impact. Here, we respond to these authors criticizing the superficial interpretation of their findings and the likely disastrous impact for the fight for gender equity in academia, focusing on the field of Brazilian Herpetology. Our goal is to highlight women’s role as mentors in Herpetology, contextualizing the gender gap in our field with the literature in gender studies.References
Ahmed N., Amin A., Arya S.S., Balela M.D., Bassioni G., Pires F.F., ..., Eresso M.Z. 2020. Motherhood in Science: How children change our academic careers Experiences shared by the GYA Women in Science Working Group.
AlShebli B., Makovi K., Rahwan T. 2020. The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance. Nature Communications. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19723-8
Astegiano J., Sebastián-González E., Castanho C.T. 2020. Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review. Royal Society Open Science. doi:10.1098/rsos.181566
Barros S.C.V., Mourão L. 2020. Gender and science: An analysis of Brazilian postgraduation. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas). doi:10.1590/1982-0275202037e180108
Bernal X.E., Rojas B., Pinto-E M.A., Mendoza-Henao A.M., Herrera-M.I., Franco A.P.C. 2019. Empowering Latina scientists. Science. doi:10.1126/science.aau6004
Bornmann L., Mutz R., Daniel H.D. 2007. Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis. Journal of Informetrics. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.03.001
Budden A.E., Tregenza T., Aarssen L.W., Koricheva J., Leimu R., Lortie C.J. 2007. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.03.008
Canaral A.C. 2016. Breve reflexão sobre mulheres cientistas, e nossa representatividade na Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia. Herpetologia Brasileira.
Carrell S., Page M.E., West J.E. 2010. Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap. NBER Working Paper 14959. doi:10.3386/w14959
Carvalho C. 2020. Rede Kunhã Asé debate produção científica das mulheres durante a pandemia. Agenda arte e cultura UFBA. Available at https://www.agendaartcultura.com.br/principais/rede-kunha-ase-debate-producao-cientifica-mulheres-pandemia/. Access: 24 de novembro de 2020.
Diele-Viegas L.M., Almeida T.S., Amati-Martins I., Bacon C.D., Cassia-Silva C., Collevatti R.G., ... Virgílio F. 2020. Gender inequality and not female mentors hinder female scientists’ career outcomes. Nature Communications. doi:10.31219/osf.io/s83zk
Dickey Z.G. 2011. Science gender gap probed. Nature. doi:10.1038/470153a
Estrada M., Hernandez P.R., Schultz P.W.A. 2018. Longitudinal Study of How Quality Mentorship and Research Experience Integrate Underrepresented Minorities into STEM Careers. Life Sciences Education. doi:10.1187/cbe.17-04-0066
Gaule P., Piacentini M. 2018. An advisor like me? Advisor gender and post-graduate careers in science. Research Policy. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.011
Goldin C., Rouse C. 2000. Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. American Economic Review. doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.715
Grogan K.E. 2019. How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace. Nature Ecology & Evolution. doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0747-4
Heilman M.E., Wallen A.S., Fuchs D., Tamkins M.M. 2004. Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416
Hofstra B., Kulkarni V.V., Galvez S.M.N., He B., Jurafsky D., McFarland D.A. 2020. The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science. PNAS. doi:10.1073/pnas.1915378117
Holman L., Stuart-Fox D., Hauser C.E. 2018. The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biology. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956
Ioannidis J.P.A., Boyack K.V., Baas J. 2020. Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators. PLoS Biology. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000918
King M.M., Bergstrom C.T., Correll S.J., Jacquet J., West J.D. 2017. Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World. doi:10.1177/2378023117738903
Knobloch-Westerwick S., Glynn C.J., Huge M. 2013. The Matilda Effect in Science Communication: An Experiment on Gender Bias in Publication Quality Perceptions and Collaboration Interest. Science Communication. doi:10.1177/1075547012472684
Larivière V., Ni C., Gingras Y., Cronin B., Sugimoto C.R. 2013. Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature News. doi:10.1038/504211a
Medina J. 2013. The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and the Social Imagination. Oxford University Press.
Moss-Racusin C.A., Dovidio J.F., Brescoll V.L., Graham M.J., Handelsman J. 2012. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. PNAS. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109
Mühlenbruch B., Jochims M. 2013. Only wholesale reform will bring equality. Nature. doi:10.1038/495040a
Nielsen M.W., Alegria S., Börjeson L., Etzkowitz H., Falk-Krzesinski H.J., Joshi A., ... Schiebinger L. 2017. Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science. PNAS. doi:10.1073/pnas.1700616114
Ortega R.P., Wessel L. 2020. For science in Latin America, ‘a fascinating challenge’. Science. doi:10.1126/science.369.6505.753
Ortega R.P., Wessel L. 2020. Colombian university fires prominent biologist accused of sexual harassment. Science. doi:10.1126/science.abb2155
Palermo S., Giuffra E., Arzenton V., Bucchi M. 2008. Gender and science. EMBO Reports. doi:10.1038/embor.2008.82
Röbler D.C., Lötters S., Da Fonte L.F. 2020. Author declaration: have you considered equity, diversity and inclusion? Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02429-8
Rossiter M.W. 1993. The Matthew Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science. doi:10.1177/030631293023002004
Rees T. 2010. Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Science in the European Union: The ETAN Report. Gender and Education. doi:10.1080/09540250120063544
Salerno P.E., Páez-Vacas M., Guayasamin J.M., Stynoski J.L. 2019. Male principal investigators (almost) don’t publish with women in ecology and zoology. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218598
Shannon G., Jansen M., Williams K., Cáceres C., Motta A., Odhiambo A., Eleveld A., Mannell J. 2019. Gender equality in science, medicine, and global health: where are we at and why does it matter? The Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33135-0
Silva T.C., Medeiros P.M., Hanazaki N., Fonseca-Kruel V.S., Hora J.S.L., Medeiros S.G. 2019. The role of women in Brazilian ethnobiology: challenges and perspectives. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. doi:10.1186/s13002-019-0322-3
Staniscuaski F., Reichert F., Werneck F.P., de Oliveira L., Mello-Carpes P.B., Soletti R.C., ... Kmetzsch L. 2020. Impact of COVID-19 on academic mothers. Science. doi:10.1126/science.abc2740
Steele J., James J.B., Barnett R.C. 2002. Learning in a man’s world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychological Women Quarterly. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00042
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1999. A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. Available at http://web.mit.edu/fnl/women/women.html#The%20Study
Valentova J.V., Otta E., Silva M.L., McElligott A.G. 2017. Underrepresentation of women in the senior levels of Brazilian science. PeerJ. doi:10.7717/peerj.4000
Werneck F.P., Jeckel A.M., Friol N.R., Toledo D.G.P., Targino M., Montesinos R., ... Canedo C. 2019. Diagnóstico e propostas para ampliar a representatividade de pesquisadoras em Herpetologia no Brasil. Herpetologia Brasileira.
Wessel L., Ortega R.P. 2020. The spark has ignited! Latin American scientists intensify fight against sexual harassment. Science. doi:10.1126/science.caredit.abb3740
Wessel L. 2020. After scalding critiques of study on gender and mentorship, journal says it is reviewing the work. Science. doi:10.1126/science.abb8164
Wu C., Fuller S., Shi Z., Wilkes R. 2020. The gender gap in commenting: Women are less likely than men to comment on (men’s) published research. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230043
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Herpetologia Brasileira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
