Herpetologia Segundo as Herpetólogas: A breath of female representation in Brazilian science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5211411Resumen
Scientific dissemination plays a fundamental role in establishing the dialogue between science and the scientist with the citizen. The ‘Herpetólogas Segundo as Herpetólogas’ (H2H; English translation – Herpetology According to Women Herpetologists) initiative appears in a scenario where women are not recognized or encouraged in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics - STEM, feeling insecure and intimidated in their academic career. These feelings often impair women’s career continuity. In addition, gender gap in Brazilian herpetological community reflects unconscious perceptions of sexist stereotypes and the lack of references or role models. At the same time that the gender gap in STEM is a hot topic of discussion, Brazilian government is threatening progress of science in the country. There is a need to develop actions to disseminate research on herpetology and educate the population on the Brazilian herpetofauna (amphibians and reptiles). When the role of women herpetologists is promoted, it generates greater representation so that young researchers, women, and other transfeminine minorities feel encouraged to dedicate themselves to science. To this end, the H2H initiative promotes research and other initiatives that involve the participation of at least one Brazilian herpetologist and elaborates several social media posts with themes on environmental education and herpetofauna. These publications have a colloquial and didactic character accessible to a diverse audience but always maintaining scientific rigor. The popularization of studies in herpetology and the reduction of prejudice against herpetofauna in Brazil, in addition to the reduction of gender bias in science, can lead to increased diversity in research groups and contribute to more effective and inclusive science.Referencias
Adabo G.M. 2017. Divulgadoras de ciência no Brasil. Master’s degree. Dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.
Astegiano J., Sebastián-González E., Castanho C.T. 2019. Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review. Royal Society Open Science 6:181566. doi:10.1098/rsos.181566.
Barbosa R. 2019. A sabotagem da ciência brasileira entre 2016 e 2017. Germinal: Marxismo e Educação em Debate 11:74–87.
Benício R.A., Fonseca M.G. 2019. Women and Science: a portrait of herpetology in the state of Piauí. Brazilian Journal of Biology 79:755–757.
Bernal X.E., Rojas B., Pinto E.M.A., Mendoza-Henao A.M., Herrera-Montes A., Herrera-Montes M.I., ... Franco A.D.P. 2019. Empowering Latina Scientists. Science 363:825–826.
Buckles K. 2019. Fixing the leaky pipeline: Strategies for making economics work for women at every stage. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33:43–60.
Cabral C.G., Pereira G.R. 2011. Introdução aos estudos CTS – Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade I. EDUFRN, Natal.
Carnaval A.C. 2016. Breve reflexão sobre mulheres cientistas, e nossa representatividade na Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia. Herpetologia Brasileira 5:47–48.
Ceci S.J., Williams W.M. 2011. Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108:3157–3162.
Chagas C., Massarani L. 2020. Manual de sobrevivência para divulgar ciência e saúde. FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro.
Clance P.R., Imes S. 1978. The Imposter Phenomenon in High Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Intervention. Psychotherapy Theory, Research and Practice 15:1–8.
Cyriac V.P., Dharwadkar S., Mital A., Mohan A.V. 70 years of Herpetology in India: insights into shifts in focal research areas and gender ratios among authors. Pacific Conservation Biology. In press.
Dourado M. 2019. Brasil é o país que mais usa redes sociais na América Latina. Olhar Digital. Accessible at https://olhardigital.com.br/2019/07/05/noticias/brasil-e-o-pais-que-mais-usa-redes-sociais-na-america-latina/#:~:text=O%20Brasil%20%C3%A9%20o,pa%C3%ADs%20que%20mais%20usa%20redes%20sociais.%20Access: 08 January 2021.
Gibney E. 2019. Discrimination drives LGBT+ scientists to think about quitting. Nature. Accessible at https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02013-9. Access: 10 january 2021.
Holman L., Stuart-Fox D., Hauser C.E. 2018. The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? Plos Biology 16:e2004956. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956.
INCT-CPCT. 2019. O que os jovens brasileiros pensam da ciência e da tecnologia? FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro.
Leta J., Araújo K.M., Guedes V.L.S. 2018. Ciência brasileira em crise: a ciência em rede como estratégia de enfrentamento. Em questão 24:1–6.
Lima B.S., De Santana Braga M., Tavares I. 2016. Participação das mulheres nas ciências e tecnologias: entre espaços ocupados e lacunas. Revista Gênero 16:11–31.
Massarani L., Moreira I.C. 2016. Science communication in Brazil: A historical review and considerations about the current situation. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 88:1577–1595.
Mohan A.V., Dharwadkar S. 2021. Women in Herpetology. Accessible at https://sanctuarynaturefoundation.org/article/women-in-herpetology. Access: 11 april 2021.
Montesinos R., Alencar T., Canedo C., Costa-Rodrigues A.P.V., Friol N.R., Jecke A.M., ... França D.P.F. 2021. Virando a Mesa: Trazendo as Mulheres para o Centro da produção e divulgação científica da Herpetologia brasileira. Pp. 25–37 in Toledo L.F. (Org.) Herpetologia Brasileira Contemporânea. Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia, São Paulo.
O’Brien K.R., Hapgood K.P. 2012. The academic jungle: ecosystem modelling reveals why women are driven out of research. Oikos 121:999–1004.
O’Quinn J., Fields J. 2020. The future of evidence: Queerness in Progressive Visions of Sexuality Education. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 17:175–187.
Parent in Science. 2020. Produtividade acadêmica durante a pandemia: Efeitos de gênero, raça e parentalidade. Accessible at https://327b60e-5cf4-492b-910b-e35e2bc67511.filesusr.com/ugd/0b341b_81cd8390df94bfd8fcd7ee6f29bcoe.pdf?index=true. Access: 8 january 2021.
Pell A.N. 1996. Fixing the leaky pipeline: Women scientists in Academia. Journal of Animal Science 74:2843–2848.
Petherick A. 2017. Careers: Austerity bites deeply. Nature 548:249–251.
Pupo S.C., Oliveira T.M., Gomes E.F., Vieira R.M.B., Santos E.I., Piassi L.P.C. 2017. Ciência, tecnologia, mídia e igualdade de gênero. Revista Científica de Comunicação Social do Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte 10:42–62.
Shannon S., Jansen M., Williams K., Cáceres C., Motta A., Odhiambo A. 2019. Gender equality in science, medicine, and global health: where are we at and why does it matter? The Lancet 393:560–569.
Shaw A.K., Stanton D.E. 2012. Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279:3736–3741.
Sheltzer J.M., Smith J.C. 2014. Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women. PNAS 111:10107–10112.
Turney S., Carvalho M.M., Sousa M.E., Birrer C., Cordeiro T.E.F., Diele-Viegas L.M., Souza L. 2020. Support transgender scientists post-COVID-19. Science 369:1171–1171.
Vergueiro V. 2016. Pensando a cisgeneridade como crítica descolonial. Pp 249–279 in Messeder S., Castro M.G., Moutinho L. (Eds.). Enlaçando sexualidade: uma tessitura interdisciplinar no reino das sexualidades e das relações de gênero. EDUFBA. Salvador.
Werneck F.P., Jeckel A.M., Friol N.R., Toledo D.G.P., Targino M., Montesinos R., ... Canedo C. 2019. Diagnóstico e propostas para ampliar a representatividade de pesquisadoras em Herpetologia no Brasil. Herpetologia Brasileira 8:36–43.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Herpetologia Brasileira

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.